Carnivore vs vegetarian

For many reasons, vegetarians are people from all parts of the world; Someone consumes vegetables, to reduce the sufferings of animals, someone is eating healthy cure for the body.
Many people want to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gas emissions worldwide, the meatless world
Why do not you say to the flesh-eating friends, some logic of vegetarianism is irrefutable. If you exclude meat from everyday food list, you will get more benefits; And the more the risks will be on the other hand, the number of benefits of the global level will also increase.
But if all the people in the world become vegetarian?
In a report, finding the answer to this question, the BBC said that the whole meatless world could not be good at all.
Whatever may be the best
 There are currently roughly three billionth of the population in the world. Beyond this, a few billion poultry people go to the stomach every year.
 By 2050, if the world excludes meat consumption, then at least seven million deaths will decrease yearly. And if eggs and milk are also dropped from the food list, then this number will stand in 80 acres.
Marko Springman, a researcher at Oxford Martin School's Future Food Program, says reducing the amount of red meat from the diet list will reduce methane production. In that case, due to food production, the level of pollution will decrease by at least 60 percent.
 Approximately 12 billion acres of land in the world are used for food production. Of these, 68 percent of the land is used for livestock. And one third of the land that is farmed, is used for fodder.
 If you exclude meat from the food list, the land will survive. By using more than 20 percent of the live land, food production can be met through more grain production. The rest of the area can be reduced through the forestry, the level of pollution and the risk of climate change.
 If you stop eating meat, it may reduce heart disease, diabetes, bleeding in the brain and several types of cancer risk. This will reduce hospital costs, which will save two to three percent of GDP in the world.
Opposite direction
Cambridge researcher Ben Falan believes that developing countries will have to deal with large economic problems if the people of the world suddenly quit eating meat. But he does not think it will be possible to make alternative livelihoods for everyone affected by the best plan.
 People in many areas of the developing world will be in danger, because one part of their income comes from animals Nothing is possible except for cattle in many areas like Sahil. In order to change their lives, virtually their cultural identity will be destroyed.
 All involved in the animal production and reproduction industry will have to take a new profession like agriculture, forestry or organic energy production industry. Unemployment and social disorder can occur due to transfer of alternative profession, especially in rural areas.
 Some more cases will come in the culture. The livestock occupies an important place in human history. Imagine the sacrifice of animals without sacrificing animals, Eid sacrifices to Christians, Thanksgiving Day to turkeys or ordinary wedding ceremonies.
 Edinburgh University researcher Peter Alexander says that the structure of many areas that we now see, have been developed since centuries of sheep-like grassland grazing for centuries. If the sheep move away from those areas, adverse reaction may change in the environment.

 Normally the amount of caloric nutrients in the meat is higher than cereals and rice. Instead of meat, instead of eating it, another nutritious meal will be brought to the list. About one-third of the world's population, that is, more than 200 million people, who are suffering from malnutrition, have to think before they even want to see a meatless world.